News & Events

NCS 2020: Conference Program

The NCS Program Committee is pleased to announce the program for the 2020 NCS Conference due to take place July 12 - 17, 2020 at Durham University.  

This exceptional program features a wide range of fascinating session topics and papers, and many thanks are extended to all those who submitted papers and panels for consideration for this conference.  The program is currently available as a .pdf file on the NCS 2020 conference page:  

Registration for the 2020 NCS Conference is not yet open, but interested members can learn more by visiting the conference website hosted by Durham University, made possible by Professor Neil Cartlidge and his exceptional team:

Further information will be soon forthcoming.

NCS 2020: Call for Papers

Twenty-second Biennial Congress
at Durham University, 12–16 July 2020 

The NCS Program Committee is pleased to announce the Call for Papers for the Society’s 2020 Congress at Durham University. Please read the Guidelines for Submission carefully before preparing your abstract. They are new this year. We hope you enjoy reading about the wide range of sessions in preparation and considering your contribution to a rich and exciting program.

Submissions in two parts (below) are due by 20 May 2019.

Sessions are listed below under an Open category and six themed threads: Orientation, Action, Gender, Code(X), Risk, and Theory Now. Session formats—Paper, Lightning, Position—are also described and are crucial to the character of individual sessions.

Please note that proposers will not be notified of the outcome of their submission until the program is complete, with all sessions settled. We expect this process to take a number of weeks.

Hearty thank yous for all their work in fashioning this call go to the Program Committee—Mary Flannery, Wan-Chuan Kao, Philip Knox and Myra Seaman, with Ruth Evans and Tom Goodmann ex officio; to Jessica Rezunyk for continuing to make things work; and to the thread and session organizers named below.

We look forward to seeing the conference take shape!

Best wishes,
Elliot Kendall and Robyn Malo
Program Committee co-chairs



Friday 28th- Saturday 29th June 2019

Hosted by the Institute of English Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London, with generous support from the New Chaucer Society

Keynote addresses by Professor Laura Kendrick (University of Versailles) and Professor David Wallace (University of Pennsylvania).


The Biennial London Chaucer Conference 2019 seeks proposals for 20-minute papers, or for panels (consisting of three 20-minute papers), on any topic related to this year’s conference theme: ‘Chaucer and Europe’. Papers should primarily address issues relating to Europe and its influences, ideas, and traditions in the age of Chaucer and his contemporaries, or in later works which engage with Chaucer’s literary afterlife. The conference aims to explore not only how the works of such great European writers as Dante, Boccaccio, Machaut, and Froissart influenced Chaucer and his contemporaries, but also how European literary traditions, forms, and styles informed the literature produced in England during the later Middle Ages. The conference also welcomes papers which explore, or engage creatively, with ideas of place, travel, and commerce in Europe, as well as issues of identity (regional, national, and international), otherness, and borders and boundaries. Interdisciplinary topics and approaches are most welcome as the conference hopes to bring together scholars and postgraduate students working in a range of disciplines and departments. 

Possible topics might include:
• The influence of European works and writers on Chaucer and/or his contemporaries
• European literary traditions (including genres, forms, styles, and themes)
• European settings, geographies, and landscapes
• Europe and the global
• Place and identity
• National and international identities
• Transport, mobility, and migration
• Pilgrimage, war, and crusading
• Translation, languages, and multilingualism
• Borders and boundaries
• Modern ideas of Medieval Europe

Proposals for single 20-minute papers should include a 250-word abstract (as well as name and affiliation). Proposals for three-paper panels should take the form of three separate abstracts as well as a brief discussion of the rationale behind the session (the name of the three speakers and, if possible, an appointed chair, should also be included). Proposals should be sent to Alastair Bennett, Hetta Howes and Natalie Jones, at by January 31st 2019

Call for submissions: In honor of Gloria Cigman

Bien chers tous,

Notre amie Gloria Cigman nous a quittés. Avec elle, s’en sont allés l’humour, la vivacité d’esprit, une forme d’élégance et de charisme. Au-delà de la peine et de la tristesse provoquées par sa perte, nous vous proposons de lui rendre hommage en lui dédiant un recueil d’articles. Les contributeurs à ce volume pourront consacrer leur article aux thèmes qui étaient chers à Gloria – la religion, les sermons lollards, les Juifs dans l’Angleterre de la fin du Moyen Age, les femmes au Moyen-Age, la littérature médiévale en général et celle qui avait trait aux formes du mal en particulier ; ou bien, s’ils préfèrent, leur choix pourra se porter sur un thème susceptible de plaire à Gloria. Dans un cas comme dans l’autre, nous nous emploierons à célébrer sa mémoire et son amour de toutes « choses médiévales ».

Les propositions d’articles (identité / affiliation + titre et quelques lignes à propos du futur article) sont à envoyer à avant le 28 février 2019.

Les normes de présentation peuvent être consultées à partir du lien suivant :


Dear everyone,

Our friend Gloria Cigman has left us. Gone with her is a great deal of humour, wit, elegance and charisma. Over and above the sadness generated by her loss, we propose to dedicate a collection of articles to her memory. Those among you wishing to contribute might devote their article either to subjects that were dear to Gloria – religion, Lollard sermons, the Jews in later medieval England, women in the Middle Ages, medieval literature in general or that relating to forms of evil in particular – or to themes likely to have aroused her interest. In both cases, we shall endeavour to celebrate her memory and her love of « all things medieval ».

Authors are invited to submit a title with a few lines about the future article together with their identification/affiliation to before 28 February 2019.

The norms for the presentation of the articles can be consulteld at


Twenty-second Biennial Congress of the New Chaucer Society
Durham, 12–16 July 2020

The NCS Program Committee invites proposals for sessions for the Societyʼs 2020 Congress in Durham. Sessions may be proposed either for the open portion of the program or directed at one of the six thematic threads described here.

We are very excited about the upcoming congress, which will consist of threaded and unthreaded sessions. About half the program will be independent sessions, with the remaining half comprising threaded sessions.

Session proposals should be sent to by 21 December.

A session proposal should include a brief description of the session suitable for the Call for Papers (100 words), an indication of thread (non-)affiliation, and designation of preferred session format(s) (Paper/Lightning/Position--see here). A short bio of the proposer should also be included (2‒3 sentences). Proposers should submit a maximum of two proposals each.

The session formats successfully introduced at our last Congress have been retained for Durham, but the Program Committee has decided to rest the Seminar format. Instead, the committee hopes that participants in all sessions, of whatever type, will pursue the goals of that venerable format through collaboration before and after the conference, including precirculation of materials where session participants agree.

A Research Expo to showcase research with strong visual or digital elements will feature again. Its launch will constitute one session on the program.

Each thread will, we hope, contain all the standard session formats, and we encourage members to consider all of these formats when designing a session proposal, whether threaded or free-standing. We also encourage members to submit sessions on pedagogy, especially in relation to thread topics.

After the closing date, thread organizers and the Program Committee will select sessions for the open program and threads and finalize session descriptions in consultation with session organizers. The Call for Papers will follow in February 2019. Please note that members will be permitted to submit only one proposal (including Expo presentation proposals) to this call.

Before then, we are very much looking forward to seeing your ideas for sessions at Durham.

Elliot Kendall and Robyn Malo
Program Committee co-chairs


International Piers Plowman Society - Anne Middleton Book Prize

The IPPS is delighted to announce the Anne Middleton Book Prize, to be awarded to the best book, published over a two-year period, substantively concerned with the literary, historical, religious, intellectual, textual-codicological, and critical contexts of Piers Plowman and related poetry and prose in the traditions of didactic and allegorical alliterative writing. “Book” refers to a substantial and original piece of scholarly and/or creative work (e.g., editions, translations, monographs), published in any format.

Owing to the generous response to the Anne Middleton Memorial Fund, to which donations are always welcome, there will be two inaugural awards of the prize, one covering works with a publication date of 2015-2016 and one covering 2017-2018 (as already advertised, before the Middleton Fund was established. Winners will receive $150 and free membership of the Society for one year (if recipients are in the “standard” category) or two years (if in the student or independent scholar categories).

The Prize Committee, comprising Andrew Cole, Wendy Scase, and Nicholas Watson, invites nominations of books published in 2015-16 and 2017-18. One nomination per book, of no more than ca. 300 words, to be sent to, should include title, publication details, an abstract of the book, and a sentence or two saying how the book contributes to Langland studies or to that of the “world” of Piers Plowman. Anyone may nominate a work: publishers, authors self-nominating, colleagues. The Committee reserves the right to award the Prize to a work that has not been nominated.

Nominators should also arrange for copies to be sent to members of the Prize Committee, preferably in hard copy if applicable, to be posted to: Andrew Cole, Department of English, Princeton University, 22 McCosh Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA; Wendy Scase, Department of English Literature, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK; Nicholas Watson, Department of English, Harvard University, Barker Center, 12 Quincy Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA. For digital items then the URL or file is fine, and if hard-copy is not feasible a digital copy can be submitted instead, to

Deadline for receipt of nominations and submissions is 15 January 2019. The two inaugural prizes will be presented at the IPPS Conference to be held in Miami, Florida, in April 2019.

The 2019 SMFS Foremothers Fellowship

The Society for Medieval Feminist Scholarship invites applications for the 2019 Foremothers Fellowship.  Funded through the generous gift of royalties from the editors and authors of the Oxford Handbook of Women and Gender in Medieval Europe (Judith Bennett and Ruth Mazo Karras), the grant provides $2,000 for a current doctoral candidate (at the time of the proposed project) to undertake a significant professional development initiative. The winner will be partnered with a senior medieval scholar whose guidance and association can assist the student in developing and executing the project.
Such projects might include:
·         Travel to a conference relevant to medieval feminist scholarship
·         Travel to visit archives, research libraries, museums, manuscript collections, or archeological or architectural sites
·         Travel to conduct other forms of on-site research 
·         Development of a digital humanities project related to feminist research
·         Organizing a medieval feminist conference or colloquium 
·         Travel to allow sustained work with a mentor 
SMFS is especially interested in assisting students who have demonstrated a financial need and whose projects are not otherwise funded. The winner must be willing to write a reflective report describing the outcome of the project. This report will appear on the SMFS public website.
Applicants should provide: a completed application form, a 500-word description of the project including its scope and development, a proposed timeline, and a detailed budget, including a break-down of projected costs. The application form can be found on the SMFS website at
Application Deadline: November 2, 2018
The winner will be announced by: Dec. 3, 2018
Email applications to Dr. Nicole Nolan Sidhu:

NCS 2020 - Call for Threads


With the Program Committee in place, co-chaired by Elliott Kendall and Robyn Malo, including Mary Flannery, Wan-Chuan Kao, Phil Knox, and Myra Seaman, I am writing to ask for your suggestions regarding the handful of threads—six or so—that will shape the intellectual interests of the 2020 Congress program. 

Please share your ideas with me at, and I will forward them to the Program Committee members, including Ruth Evans, ahead of our meeting here in Miami on the weekend of 6 October.

Thank you in advance for your ideas.


Incoming Executive Director’s Remarks to the Members Parliament

It is humbling for me to look over the list of previous executive directors of the New Chaucer Society, and to join in the same work. I hope to sustain and to develop our organization with all of you, with the President, and with the Trustees, enjoying the intimidating good fortune to follow Ruth Evans, who has given NCS six years of her remarkable gifts of guidance for, and gracious representation of the Society. I am very glad (and relieved) that she will take up the position of President for the coming two years, and I want to thank Ardis Butterfield for her engaged leadership of the Society, and for her generous advice to me in approaching this transition.

As you will know from Ruth’s remarks, NCS is a very healthy organization in intellectual and financial terms.  Our Biennial Congress continues to be a rich experience—with special thanks this year to Professor Alex Gillespie, Victoria University President Will Robins, to the other members of local organizing committee, and to Claire Waters and Bobby Meyer-Lee, co-chairs of the Program Committee, along with the other members. The Congress includes the Graduate Student Workshop; the return of the Mentorship Program; and the Preconference Teachers’ Workshop—a leading initiative in now widely energized efforts to engage with K12 teachers.  Studies in the Age of Chaucer is an annual journal of the first order, publishing scholarship at a very selective rate of acceptance under the editorship of Sarah Salih, along with Book Reviews editor Shayne Legassie. The editorship, as you know, will pass to the capable hands of Jennifer Jahner, Michelle Karnes, and Sebastian Sobecki, while Stephanie Amsel continues to maintain the Chaucer Bibliography along with the help of several of our colleagues. In the years ahead, I will miss the conciliar voices of outgoing trustees Candace Barrington, Alexandra Gillespie, and David Matthews, while anticipating the opportunity to work with newly elected trustees Seeta Chaganti, David Raybin, and Marion Turner, along with continuing trustees Anthony Bale, Simon Horobin, Patricia Ingham, and Emily Steiner. 

Looking back, prompted by Ruth’s sharing of the Society’s documents, and by recent queries from Wan-Chuan Kao about the Society’s formative years, I note that the history of NCS, incorporated in 1977, coincides closely with the broad decline, including some intermittent upticks, in tenure-earning positions for humanities PhDs. Looking forward, I wonder what we might do further to support those who are navigating circumstances of precarity, and to ensure ongoing inclusion of, and engagement with colleagues who do not hold tenure-earning faculty appointments at colleges and universities, as well as developing membership among middle and secondary school professionals, and among colleagues around the world. How might we do so?

As well, we might consider how to create conversations with non-academics who may not know of many changes in higher education and in the humanities, of the work we do as teachers, researchers, writers, and in many forms of service. (Toward this idea of extended public outreach, I remember Robert Bast, the founding director of the MARCO Institute at Tennessee, laughing to recall how many church groups with whom he was obliged to speak about The Da Vinci Code, then newly published, honoring the terms of outreach for a 2.2 million dollar NEH grant to found the Institute). We know that many people are interested in some idea of the Middle Ages—if only via Game of Thrones, and if often for complicated and sometimes deeply troubling reasons.  We can do still more good work to engage the public—serving a moveable feast, perhaps, of lectures—and to encourage broad support for study of the Middle Ages, of the Age of Chaucer, extending the research, pedagogies, presentations and workshops of the Global Middle Ages, Global Chaucers, and Medievalists of Color.

While we consider how to continue making the Congress inclusive, some members have raised questions about the size of the meeting, and the fact that running eight to eleven concurrent sessions means, of course, that engaging in one, we miss the others. Other members have expressed concerns about the costs of travel and accommodation. While academic calendars suggest just this time frame for the Congress, organizing an international meeting at the peak of travel season in the northern hemisphere has such cost implications. We must clarify practical matters of choice in scheduling, number of participants, and matters of cost, while valuing inclusiveness and community. Every choice we make has consequences that change with time and place. We need to discuss them as a community, understanding that no outcome will be ideal for all. For example, I think it a good idea to consider meeting the Congress outside North America and Western Europe—perhaps in Australia or New Zealand, or in one of several places in southeast Asia or Asia—out of respect to colleagues who travel very long distances, and in service to the complex project of a global Middle Ages. And yet the costs of travel for many members to such a location likely would prove prohibitive; this is one among many questions of inclusivity, both practical and ethical.  I encourage all of you to consider these questions, and to think of ways to work with colleagues in your area—and perhaps across geographical divides—to propose collaborative hosting for the Congress in future.

Looking further toward the future, I note that the articles of incorporation charter NCS for fifty years, and expire on 6 June 2027. What is the New Chaucer Society we want and need now and in the next nine years—and the one we might imagine for the next ninety? Does our Society still need the word “new” in its name? Will it remain in the interests and capacities of all of us working mainly in late medieval England—to say nothing of medieval studies of all disciplines—to subscribe to a number of societies that are single author or text-centered: Chaucer, Gower, Hoccleve, Pearl-poet, Piers Plowman, Lollard, Margery Kempe—just to name those immediate proximate to NCS? Can we imagine new and mutually beneficial affiliations? There is, at least, potential for growth internally, beyond the nearly seven hundred current members of NCS: in what ways and toward what ends might we grow both in our numbers, but also in our thinking, first, by re-engaging with those Chaucerians whose memberships have lapsed? 

It is both a vibrant and urgent time in Chaucer studies—literally a changing world of medieval studies—as the work many of you are doing deepens and broadens our understanding of the past resonant in temporal, geographical, and cultural terms, meanwhile contesting distorted appropriations of “nation” and ethnic identities in service of dangerous agendas. I hope that all of us know that all of us are needed to engage, educate, refute, and promote, and sometimes to do such work among ourselves. We do a lot of things well, and we can always do better.

Again, I feel very fortunate for all of us and for myself to have Ruth Evans as President over the next two years. Please forgive some inevitable bobbles as I learn the ways and means of NCS, and in 2020 too, when Jessica Rezunyk will step down having served NCS so very admirably for a decade. Our yet-to-be-named program assistant in Miami will have much to learn, as do I, most of all.  Thank you in advance for your patience; I will always welcome your ideas, your questions, your concerns, and your advice. 

Thomas Goodmann

July 2018